Lyn James
Introduction
This work will examine the reasons for the decline of the
manor of West Derby after King’s John’s Charter of 1207 and the rise of the
fortunes of Liverpool from that date.
It will provide, and comment upon, written evidence from both early and
contemporary historians.
West Derby at the time of the Conquest was an important
administrative centre. The hundred of
West Derby was one of the six hundreds which formed the county of
Lancashire. Within the Derby hundred
was the manor of West Derby with its six berewicks, one of which was the
settlement at Liverpool. Picton gives
us some idea of the importance. Situated in the middle of a forest
we cannot conceive that West Derby in its early days could develop to any
extent yet we catch glimpses in our ancient records that it was held in
considerable estimation[1]. We can be fairly certain that West Derby was
first settled by the Vikings. Cooper[2]
suggests that West Derby was invaded and settled during the 9th
Century by the Norse Vikings who had founded Dublin although many historians
believe its settlement to have been gradual and peaceful rather violent. Most
likely these Vikings made their way through the thick forest that covered much
of the lands of southern Lancashire via the river Alt. The strongest evidence for these Nordic
beginnings can be found in the place name, Deor and By (or Bei)
meaning village with deer. In its early
history West Derby was known simply as Derbie (appearing so in Domesday) and
took on the ‘West’ to distinguish it from Derby in Derbyshire. Names from the surrounding areas such as
Croxteth also have Viking origins.
The area was attractive to its early settlers as it had the
three things necessary for survival; water (from the rich sandstone deposits),
food (from the deer that proliferated) and a defensive position (behind the
present Queens Drive).
Some time before the Conquest, Edward the Confessor chose
West Derby as a site for a castle and hunting lodge. An early form of feudalism was established, one that was adapted
by William 1 after the Conquest. West
Derby was still held by Edward in 1066, but was given by the Conqueror to Roger of Pictou. It was probably Roger who built the castle
of West Derby, a wooden construction of a motte and bailey, figure of
eight design. The demesne land and forest gave the castle and
manor of West Derby importance as a centre of administration in Lancashire
equal to that of Lancaster.
Cooper
tells us that after the decline of the castle, the township and the village
settled down to a ‘low-profile’ existence…until West Derby’s own renaissance in
Victorian times[3].
Early settlers would have seen the sandy shores running from
the far north and the sand hills that terminated at Kirkdale becoming a flat
sandy beach as it reached the settlement.
The most prominent and important feature in the landscape was the
Pool. The Pool was a tidal creek
running inland in a north-easterly direction for about half a mile up the
present Paradise Street and Whitechapel until it reached the beginning of Byrom
Street. Muir[4]
suggests that the Pool, with its abundance of fish and its safe harbour, was
probably the cause of the creation of the township. However, the area had far more to offer. Fresh water was plentiful from the sandstone
rock and the area was sheltered by the long ridge of hill rising to present day
Everton. It is possible that a ferry
service was operated by the serfs who paid the dues to the manor of West
Derby. We cannot discount the
possibility of the appearance of the odd boat arriving from Ireland or Wales to
trade. Muir also suggests that To
the north and west of the Pool lay a handful of mud hovels which formed the
Berwick of Liverpool. They probably lay
somewhere about the site of the Town Hall[5]. Although no written or archaeological
evidence is offered by Muir (and future excavation is unlikely given the
present density of the area), a fine picture is painted and one that helps us
imagine life at that time. The first mention we have of the place name comes in a
document of 1191. Henry 11 had
previously granted Liverpool and other lands to Warin, Constable of Lancaster
although this deed in not extant. The
transaction was confirmed in a subsequent document between the sons of the
original agreement. Our early story
concludes on 25 August 1207 when King John took back these lands from Henry
(Warin’s son), compensating him with other lands. Five days later on 28 August 1207, Liverpool was put well
and truly on the map with the grant of the first royal Letters Patent by King
John (usually now referred to as the first Charter). So what was it that
inspired this royal faith in this rather small and unassuming settlement? For this we must go back a year or so. Records show that John was in both Lancaster
and Chester in February of 1206. At
that time he was seeking a convenient boarding place for his troops and
provisions to complete the subjugation of Ireland. Whether it was a personal choice, or whether he acted on the
advice of the sheriffs who were sent to reconnoitre the area, is unclear.
The date of the construction of Liverpool castle is unknown
but we can surmise that it was prior to 1235 as the first undisputed
documentary reference to it describes its fortification[6].
PRIVILEGES.
As part of the charter of King John, Liverpool was made a free borough,
one of only twelve in the country.
Farrer tells us that privileges in the charter included ‘all the liberties and free customs
which any free borough on the sea or has in our land’. If taken literally this would place
Liverpool from the outset on the same level as Bristol and Southampton[7].
These restrictive trade practices would have been seen as very
attractive to the local tradesman.
Trading privileges were further increased in the Charter of King Henry
111. Burgesses gained exemption from
the tolls not only in the Borough, but also throughout the kingdom. HOSPITALITY. Liverpool provided a port from which King John’s military assaults on Ireland could be launched. Troops required bed and board and were a source of economic activity for the burgesses of Liverpool. Similarly, provisions for the ships would have been provided by the local burgesses, another source of trading income. MIGRATION FROM WEST DERBY. It is not unreasonable to assume that some of the rise in the
fortunes of Liverpool could have been facilitated by the migration of people
from the township of West Derby. It is
very likely that the families of those troops, and other people fleeing from a
declining township of West Derby, came to Liverpool to boost not only its
population but its economic activity.
Indeed, Farrer alludes to Lancs Pipe Roll 220 and tells us that a considerable number of people were
removed to Liverpool in 1208 to form the new borough and the sheriff had an
allowance of the farm of the hundred probably to make up for this loss on his
account[8]. GUILDS.
A very important step forward came in 1229 with the granting of King
Henry 111 charter. The inhabitants of
Liverpool raised ten marks to purchase further privileges. The privileges of the Letters Patent of King
John in 1207 had been confirmed in subsequent charters but this one gave the
right to have a gild merchant with a hansa and all the liberties and free
customes pertaining to that gild.
Trade previously confined to the burgages was now confined to members of
the gild and no-one could trade without licence.
Some of the
reasons for the growth of Liverpool given above may be seen as
conjectural. However, there is some
extant evidence that supports the theory of the growth in the fortunes of
Liverpool during the medieval period.
The yield to the royal exchequer shows us how Liverpool was
administratively dependant on West Derby during its formative years. From 1211 to 1219 the profits of the new
town of Liverpool were incorporated in those of West Derby. We might assume from this that the borough
was administered by the steward of the parent manor. Although in 1222 and the following years, a separate assized rent
of £9 was charged on the town, it is not easy to determine what was covered by
this rent. It may have included some or
all of the fees for the mills and the ferry, the court fines as well as the
burgage rents. Probably a
better indication of the growth of the borough may be seen from the
tallages. In 1219 Liverpool paid half a
mark, West Derby paid a mark and Preston 10 marks. In 1222, Liverpool paid 5 marks, West Derby paid 1 mark and
Preston 15 marks. In 1227 Liverpool
paid 11 marks and 6d, WD paid 7 marks 4s and 4d, Preston paid 15 marks and
6d. This represents a twenty-fold
increase within a period of eighteen years. West Derby was an important administrative district during
the period between the conquest and the beginning of the thirteenth
century. However, its inland position
became its downfall. At a time when a
port on the North Western shores was needed, Liverpool received royal favour,
and with it the privileges attractions and stimulation that would see Liverpool
eventually rising to become a prosperous township. The favours conferred upon Liverpool by the numerous royal
charters following that of King John only served to increase the attractiveness
of Liverpool as a place of settlement.
Its growth continued steadily during the medieval period until it had
eventually overtaken West Derby in importance.
However, its national importance should be seen in context. To look at Liverpool to today, one might
imagine it as a large and significant city throughout the ages. This is not so and it may surprise visitors,
and some locals alike, that the beginnings of Liverpool as a significant town
began only with the opening of first dock in 1715. Indeed it was not until 1880 that city status was granted by
royal charter. [1] Picton
(1875, p 418) [2] Cooper
(1993, p29) [3] Cooper (1993, p56) [4] (1906, p9) [5] (1906, p?) [6] 1235 Patent
Rolls, 19 Henry 111, m.5 (cited by Chandler, 1957, p20) [7] Farrer
(1907) vol 4, p 3 [8] Farrer
(1907) vol 3, p 13 BIBLIOGRAPHY AUGHTON, Peter.
(1993). Liverpool, A People’s
History. Carnegie Publishing. 2nd edition.
BAINES,
Edward. (1836). History of the County Palatine and Duchy
of Lancaster CHANDLER, G. (1957). Liverpool. BT Batsford Ltd COOPER, John and D Power. (1987). A History of West Derby. Causeway Press Ltd. 2nd edition. FARRER, W
and J Brownbill. (1907). The
Victoria History of the County of Lancaster. Constable & Co Vol 3 MUIR, R and E Platt. (1906). A History of Municipal Government in Liverpool. Williams & Norgate. MUIR, Ramsay. (1907). History of Liverpool. Williams & Norgate. NICHOLSON, S (editor). (1981). The Changing Face of Liverpool 1207 – 1727. Merseyside Archaeological Society. PICTON, JA. (1875). Memorials of Liverpool. Longman Green & Co SCOUSE PRESS. (1996). An Illustrated Everyday History of Liverpool and Merseyside. Scouse Press
Lyn James (February 2003)
|
![]() |
Return to Articles Page |